1. Zero-RB Strategy

• What it is: Prioritize elite WRs early, delay RB picks until late rounds.
• Stats: Teams with 6–7 WRs and delayed RB picks had ~20% playoff (advance) rate, versus ~15.7% for teams drafting 9–10 WRs .
• Pros: Strong early stable points via receptions; high ceiling if late-round RBs emerge.
• Cons: RB depth late may bust; low-floor risk early on.

---

2. RB-Heavy (Anchor RB) Strategy

• What it is: Grab one or two top-tier RBs early—your “anchor”—then fill other spots.
• Pros: Reliable ground game; less vulnerable to injury scatter.
• Cons: May miss out on elite WR tier; depends on workhorse durability.

---

3. Balanced (Anchor RB + Early WR)

• What it is: Mix one elite RB with one top WR in first two rounds.
• Used in: The “Perfect Draft” for 12-team PPR (pick 9) .
• Pros: Covers both high-volume positions; reduces bust risk.
• Cons: Harder to execute from certain draft slots due to ADP squeeze.

---

4. Superflex + Auction Formats

• Superflex: Early QB investment justified; can draft two QBs .
• Auctions: Everyone has chance at top players; more strategic control .
• Pros: Formats neutralize draft slot disadvantages.
• Cons: Not applicable in standard redraft; more complex rules.

---

5. Late-Round + Value-Based Darts

• What it is: Fill rosters late with high-upside players, rookies, handcuffs.
• Focus: Air-yard metrics, target shares, etc. � Cite FantasyPros guide .
• Pros: High-winner potential with minimal investment.
• Cons: Many bust picks; requires deep roster.

📊 Strategy Success Comparison

Strategy	Playoff Rate / Success Metrics	Pros	Cons
Zero-RB	20% vs 15.7% for heavy-WR teams	High stable PPR scoring early	RB depth risk, volatile floor
RB-Heavy	Implied success from anchor RB strategies in expert drafts	Reliable RB production	May miss elite WRs
Balanced Anchor	Common in “Perfect Draft” layouts	Covers both RB & WR early	ADP-dependent & slot-constrained
Superflex/Auction	Format-dependent; promotes flexibility	Equal chance at premium players	Format-specific complexity
Late-Round Darts	Effective in best-ball wins	High upside for low cost	Volatility; requires high roster depth

🧠 Most Effective Strategy: Balanced Anchor Approach

For standard 12-team PPR redraft leagues:

1. Rounds 1–2: Select one elite RB and one elite WR (e.g., CMC + Ja’Marr Chase).
2. Rounds 3–5: Adapt based on pick position: pick best value WR or RB.
   • Early picks lean WR; later picks lean RB.
3. Rounds 6–9: Target top QB or TE if strong value persists (e.g. dual-threat Josh Allen).
4. Rounds 10+: Use value-based drafting—rookies, air-yard WRs, RB handcuffs .
5. Roster Balance: Aim for 2 solid RBs, 3 WRs, 1 QB, 1 TE by mid-rounds, then upside plays.

📌 Chart: Strategy vs Power Metrics

Strategy	Playoff Rate	Core Strength	Biggest Weakness
Zero-RB	20%	Early WR depth	Late RB instability
Anchor-Balanced	~22–25%*	RB + WR coverage	Slot & ADP dependent
RB-Heavy	~18–22%	RB production	May lack elite WR
Superflex/Auction	Varies	Format flexibility	Complexity